Salat v. Pirotto et al
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/12/2015 ORDERING 41 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendants' 24 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED without leave to amend.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
IMHOTEP SALAT,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-01468 MCE AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MICHAEL PIROTTO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).
On January 13, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 41. Neither
22
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 13, 2015, ECF No. 41, are adopted in
full; and
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 24, is granted without leave to amend as to
1
1
plaintiff’s claims for violation of the Federal Financial Privacy Act, 12 U.S.C. § 3400 et seq., and
2
42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on Defendant Pirotto’s investigation of D & I Special Care Services, LLC
3
and D & I Special Care Services.
4
Dated: February 12, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?