Cramer v. Horowitz et al
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/15/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 29 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 24 Motion to Dismiss as to the plaintiff's damages claim against the defendant in her official capacity; DENYING 24 Motion to Dismiss in all other respects. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LORENZO CRAMER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1472-TLN-EFB P
v.
ORDER
EVALYN HOROWITZ,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 22, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendant has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 30.)
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 22, 2015, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 24) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s damages
4
claim against Defendant in her official capacity and DENIED in all other respects.
5
6
Dated: January 15, 2016
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?