Hensley v. Gomez et al

Filing 11

AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/10/2014 ORDERING the Settlement Conference RESCHEDULED to 1/29/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS, SBN 265903 P.O. Box 7006 Stockton, CA 95267 Tel: 866-790-2242 Fax: 888-802-2440 Attorney for PLAINTIFF: ROSELYN HENSLEY 5 6 7 8 9 CATHERINE M. CORFEE (SBN: 155064) CORFEE STONE & ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 1098 Carmichael, CA 95609 Telephone: (916) 487-5441 Facsimile: (916) 487-5440 Email: legalassistant@corfeestone.com 10 11 ATTORNEYS FOR ALL DEFENDANTS 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 ROSELYN HENSLEY, 17 Plaintiff, 18 19 vs. 21 SYLVIA GOMEZ, dba COYOTES MEXICAN DINING, ISAAC KUBRYK, RENEE KUBRYK, and Does 1-10, 22 Defendants. 20 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:14-cv-01478-KJM-DAD AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 24 25 All parties in this action respectfully request the Court postpone the Settlement 26 Conference set by the Minute Order of October 29, 2014 (Dkt. 7). All parties stipulate to 27 moving the Settlement Conference by thirty-eight (38) days from December 22, 2014. The 28 parties stipulate to rescheduling the Settlement Conference due to a scheduling conflict with 1 Ms. Corfee. She will be with family for the holiday on December 22, 2014. The new requested 2 date of the Settlement Conference is January 29, 2015 or around that time. Plaintiff agrees to 3 changing the Settlement Conference date. 4 5 Dated: December 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel Malakauskas Daniel Malakauskas, Esq., Attorney for Plaintiff 6 7 8 CORFEE STONE & ASSOCIATES 9 10 /s/ Catherine M. Corfee Catherine M. Corfee, Esq., Attorney for all Defendants 11 12 13 ORDER 14 15 16 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 10, 2014 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ddad1\orders.civil hensley1478.stip.cont.ord.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?