Pannell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/16/15 APPROVING 25 Stipulation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the parties' 25 stipulation, the action is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with this or der pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice as MOOT. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of plaintiff and against the Commissioner. The Clerk of Court shall VACATE all dates and CLOSE this case. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration ELLINOR CODER Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8955 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Ellinor.Coder@ssa.gov 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 BRAD PANNELL, 14 Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:14-cv-01514-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and 22 with the approval of the Court, that the Commissioner has agreed to a voluntary remand of this 23 case for further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 24 25 26 Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to take the following action: The ALJ will be directed to weigh all the medical opinions of record regarding the 27 claimant’s mental health during the period at issue, including the medical opinions of Janice 28 Nakagawa, Ph.D., Troy Ewing, Psy.D., Judy Martin, M.D., and D. Funkelstein, M.D., Stip. & Order for Remand; 2:14-cv-01514-KJN 1 1 articulating the weight assigned each opinion and the reasons for that weight (20 CFR 2 § 404.1527 and 416.927); reevaluate the credibility of the claimant’s allegations (20 CFR 3 § 404.1529 and Social Security Ruling 96-7p); reassess the claimant’s residual functional 4 capacity (20 CFR § 404.1545 and Social Security Rulings 85-16 and 96-8p); and, if warranted at 5 step five, obtain evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effects of the assessed 6 limitations on the occupational base (20 CFR § 404.1566; Social Security Ruling 83-14). 7 The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final 8 judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the 9 Commissioner. Respectfully submitted, 10 11 Dated: April 14, 2015 12 BESS M. BREWER By: 13 Attorney for Plaintiff 14 15 /s/ Ellinor Coder for Bess M. Brewer*___ *By email authorization on April 14, 2015 Dated: April 14, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 16 17 18 21 /s/ Ellinor Coder ELLINOR CODER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney OF COUNSEL: AMANDA SCHAPEL Assistant Regional Counsel 22 Attorneys for Defendant 19 By: 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. & Order for Remand; 2:14-cv-01514-KJN 2 1 2 3 ORDER The parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 25) is APPROVED. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the action is remanded for further administrative 5 proceedings consistent with this order pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 6 405(g). 7 8 9 10 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19) is denied without prejudice as moot. 3. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against the Commissioner. 4. The Clerk of Court shall vacate all dates and close this case. 11 12 Dated: April 16, 2015 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. & Order for Remand; 2:14-cv-01514-KJN 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?