Cleveland v. Owens

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/9/2014 DENYING, without prejudice, petitioner's 2 request to proceed IFP; the Clerk shall provide petitioner with another copy of the ifp application for non-prisoners; and petitioner shall submit, within 30 days, a fully completed ifp application. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KEVIN ARTHER CLEVELAND, 11 12 13 No. 2:14-cv-01528 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER RONALD SCOTT OWENS, 14 Respondent. 15 16 Petitioner, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas 17 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma 18 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF Nos. 1, 2. Based on petitioner’s current address 19 which indicates that he is no longer incarcerated, the court is unable to determine whether 20 plaintiff is indigent and unable to pay the filing fees for the present action. Therefore, petitioner 21 will be provided an opportunity to update his financial status by submitting a fully completed 22 application to proceed in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No.2) is denied without 25 26 27 28 prejudice; 2. The Clerk of the Court shall provide petitioner with another copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court for non-prisoners; and 3. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a fully completed 1 1 in forma pauperis application. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a 2 recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 3 DATED: July 9, 2014 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?