Sacramento City Unified School District v. Harlan et al
Filing
45
JUDGMENT ON IDEA CLAIMS signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/22/2017 ORDERING that Defendants/Counterclaimants are the prevailing party with respect to both Plaintiff's claim under IDEA and Defendants/Counterclaimant's first cause o f action under the IDEA; on Issues 1(a) and 1(b) in the underlying administrative decision in OAH Case No. 2013100405; Defendants/Counterclaimants are entitled to reimbursement of their costs associated with R.H.'s placement at Falcon Ridge; Def endants/Counterclaimants are entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection both with the underlying administrative action and this action. The Clerk of Court shall release the deposit made to the Court by Plaintiff on 7 /2/2014, in the amount of $111,368.75. Within thirty (30) days of the release of the funds by the Court, Plaintiff shall Reimburse Defendant/Counterclaimant K.H. in the amount of $45,400; Reimburse Defendant/Counterclaimant J.H. in the amou nt of $45,946; Pay Defendant/Counterclaimant K.H. interest in the amount of $3,105.04; Pay Defendants/Counterclaimants' reasonable attorneys' fees and costs associated with the underlying administrative proceeding before OAH and this action, in the amount of $152,500, to Ruderman & Knox, LLP. (cc: Financial) (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT,
No. 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DB
JUDGMENT ON IDEA CLAIMS
Plaintiff,
15
16
v.
18
R.H., by and through her Guardians ad
litem, J.H. and K.H., and J.H. and K.H.,
Individually,
19
Defendants,
17
20
21
22
R.H., by and through her Guardians ad
litem, J.H. and K.H., and J.H. and K.H.,
Individually,
Counterclaimants,
23
24
25
v.
SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT,
26
27
Counterclaim Defendants.
28
1
1
The Court’s Opinion dated October 7, 2016 (ECF Doc. 32) disposed of the parties’
2
respective claim and counter-claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
3
(“IDEA”) in the favor of Defendants/Counterclaimants R.H. et al.
4
(“Defendants/Counterclaimants”). Said disposition affirmed those parts of the underlying
5
May 23, 2014 decision in California Office of Administrative Hearing (“OAH”) Case No.
6
2013100405 at issue in this litigation.
7
Although Defendants/Counterclaimants’ counterclaims against Plaintiff/Defendant
8
Sacramento City Unified School District (“Plaintiff”) under Section 504 remain at issue,
9
there is no just reason for delay of judgment on the IDEA causes of action.
10
Based upon the Court’s October 7, 2016 opinion, Plaintiff does not oppose the terms
11
of this Proposed Judgment and has agreed not to appeal the Proposed Judgment if entered
12
as proposed.
13
Upon Plaintiff’s satisfaction of the Judgment, the Parties have agreed to execute a
14
stipulation pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dismissing the
15
remaining 504 claims in this matter with prejudice.
16
Now therefore, it is ORDERED, that:
17
1.
Defendants/Counterclaimants are the prevailing party with respect to both
18
Plaintiff’s claim under IDEA and Defendants/Counterclaimant’s first cause of action under
19
the IDEA;
20
2.
Defendants/Counterclaimants were the prevailing party on Issues 1(a) and
21
1(b) in the underlying administrative decision in OAH Case No. 2013100405, which also
22
arose under the IDEA;
23
3.
Defendants/Counterclaimants are entitled to reimbursement of their costs
24
associated with R.H.’s placement at Falcon Ridge, as ordered by the Administrative Law
25
Judge in the underlying administrative decision in OAH Case No. 2013100405;
26
4.
That based upon the above, Defendants/Counterclaimants are entitled to
27
reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection both with the underlying
28
administrative action and this action.
2
1
Having reviewed the attached Declaration of Colleen Snyder and exhibits evidencing
2
proof of payment by Defendants/Counterclaimants J.H. and K.H., and GOOD CAUSE
3
APPEARING,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that:
5
1) The Clerk of Court shall release the deposit made to the Court by Plaintiff on July 2,
6
2014, in the amount of $111,368.75. The deposit shall be released to
7
Defendants/Counterclaimants, R.H., J.H. and K.H. through their attorneys Rudman
8
& Knox, LLP, to be applied toward satisfaction of the Judgment;
9
10
2) Within thirty (30) days of the release of the funds by the Court, Plaintiff shall:
a. Reimburse Defendant/Counterclaimant K.H. in the amount of $45,400, for
11
the cost of tuition and travel associated with R.H.’s placement during the
12
2013-2014 school year, including extended school year;
13
b. Reimburse Defendant/Counterclaimant J.H. in the amount of $45,946, for the
14
cost of tuition and travel associated with R.H.’s placement during the 2013-
15
2014 school year, including extended school year;
16
17
18
c. Pay Defendant/Counterclaimant K.H. interest in the amount of $3,105.04;
and
d. Pay Defendants/Counterclaimants’ reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs
19
associated with the underlying administrative proceeding before OAH and
20
this action, in the amount of $152,500, to Ruderman & Knox, LLP.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: February 22, 2017
25
26
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?