Sacramento City Unified School District v. Harlan et al

Filing 47

STIPULATION and ORDER TO DISMISSAL OF SECTION 504 COUNTERCLAIMS signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/5/2017 ORDERING that pursuant to Rule 41(a) (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6

F. Richard Ruderman (SB No. 142226)
[e-mail]
Colleen A. Snyder (SB No. 274064)
[e-mail]
Ruderman & Knox, LLP
1300 National Drive, Suite 120
Sacramento, CA 95834
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaimants

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT,

12

CASE NO: 2:14-CV-01549-TLN-DB
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF
SECTION 504 COUNTERCLAIMS;
AND JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14
15

R.H., by and through her Guardians ad
litem, J.H. and K.H., and J.H. and K.H.,
Individually,

16

Defendants,

Judge:

17
18
19

R.H., by and through her Guardians ad
litem, J.H. and K.H., and J.H. and K.H.,
Individually,
Counterclaimants,

20
21
22

vs.
SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT,

23
24

Counterclaim Defendants.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF SECTION 504 COUNTERCLAIMS;
& ORDER

Case No. 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DB

1

Hon. Troy L. Nunley

1

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Sacramento City Unified

2

School District (“the District”) and Defendants/Counterclaimants R.H., by and through her

3

Guardians ad Litem, J.H. and K.H., and J.H. and K.H., Individually, (“Parents”), hereby agree and

4

stipulate to dismissal of the remaining issues and all remaining claims in the above-captioned case,

5

including specifically Parents’ counterclaims under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

6

The Court previously entered judgment on the IDEA claims in this matter on February 22, 2017.

7
8

Therefore, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the District and
Parents hereby jointly request that the case be dismissed with prejudice.

9
10

Dated: May __, 2017

RUDERMAN & KNOX, LLP

11
12

/s/
COLLEEN A. SNYDER
Attorney for Defendants and
Counterclaimants K.H., J.H., and R.H.,
by and through her Guardians ad Litem

13
14
15
16
17

Dated: May 2, 2017

LOZANO SMITH

18
/s/
SLOAN R. SIMMONS
Attorney for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim Defendant Sacramento City Unified
School District

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF SECTION 504 COUNTERCLAIMS;
& ORDER

Case No. 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DB

2

1
2
3
4

ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ foregoing stipulation and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING
THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that this case be dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Date: May 5, 2017

7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF SECTION 504 COUNTERCLAIMS;
& ORDER

Case No. 2:14-cv-01549-TLN-DB

3