Bowman v. Valentine & Kebartas, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/15/15: No later than July 2, 2015, plaintiff shall file a brief statement indicating whether or not she intends to proceed with the action. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONNA BOWMAN, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-1563-JAM-KJN PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER VALENTINE & KEBARTAS, INC., 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff, at that time represented by counsel, commenced this action on July 2, 2014. 19 (ECF No. 1.) However, on May 4, 2015, the district judge granted plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to 20 withdraw. (ECF No. 14.) In the motion to withdraw, plaintiff’s former counsel indicated that 21 plaintiff had not responded to any of his communications since at least December 2014. (ECF 22 No. 12.) Plaintiff’s former counsel provided a last-known address for plaintiff, which the Clerk 23 of Court has recorded in the court’s records. (Id.) Thereafter, on June 12, 2015, the case was 24 referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). (ECF No. 15.) 25 26 27 28 In light of the above, it is unclear whether plaintiff still wishes to proceed with the action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. No later than July 2, 2015, plaintiff shall file a brief statement indicating whether or not she intends to proceed with the action, and if so, whether she needs a brief period 1 1 of time to obtain new counsel. If plaintiff no longer wishes to proceed with the action 2 at this time, she may instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without 3 prejudice no later than July 2, 2015. 4 2. Failure to timely respond to this order will be deemed to be plaintiff’s consent to 5 dismissal of the action, and will result in a recommendation of dismissal pursuant to 6 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 15, 2015 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?