Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Warner et al

Filing 9

ORDER REMANDING CASE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/12/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 are ADOPTED in FULL; this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Shasta; Plaintiff's 4 ex parte application for an order shortening time is DENIED as unnecessary; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-1574-TLN-CMK

v.

ORDER

WILLIAM W. WARNER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was referred to a

17
18

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.
On December 3, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

19
20

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file

21

objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been

22

filed.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

23
24

supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.

25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

26

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 3, 2014, are adopted in
full;

27
28

///
1

1
2
3
4
5

2. This matter is remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California,
County of Shasta;
3. Plaintiff’s ex parte application for an order shortening time is denied as
unnecessary; and
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated: February 12, 2015

9
10
11

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2