Harrell v. Hornbrook Community Services District, et al.

Filing 141

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/7/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint shall be due to be filed on or before April 21, 2017. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PETER T. HARRELL, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-1595 KJM GGH v. ORDER HORNBROOK COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On March 29, 2017, District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller issued an Order adopting 19 Findings and Recommendations and granting Plaintiff 14 days from the date of other order to file 20 a third amended complaint. Plaintiff Harrell now seeks a 21 day extension of time to comply 21 with the court’s order. 22 This has been pending in this court since July 7, 2014. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff has amended 23 his original complaint twice, each time expanding the numbers of pages included in the filing. 24 See ECF Nos. 10, 59. In Judge Mueller’s Order plaintiff is limited to filing a 25 page complaint 25 which should take considerably less time that his previous efforts. If plaintiff were to 26 straightforwardly obey the Court’s Order his Third Amended Complaint would be due on April 27 12, 2017. It is time to bring this matter to the point where it can be addressed on the merits. 28 Although the court would prefer not to extend any time, given the distance that plaintiff is from 1 1 this courthouse, and his apparent inability to use the ECF system for near instantaneous filing, the 2 court will nonetheless grant an addition 14 days to the time ordered by Judge Mueller and 3 plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint shall be due to be filed on or before April 21, 2017. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 7, 2017 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?