Harrell v. Hornbrook Community Services District, et al.

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/29/14 DENYING 6 Motion to Amend the Complaint without prejudice to its refilling, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

PETER T. HARRELL,

10
11
12
13

No. 2:14-cv-1595 KJM GGH PS

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

HORNBROOK COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42
U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986, and 1988.
On August 21, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint. Plaintiff’s

19

motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. Since plaintiff did

20

not submit a proposed amended complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 21, 2014 motion for

22

leave to amend is denied without prejudice to its refiling, accompanied by a proposed amended

23

complaint.

24

Dated: August 29, 2014

25

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

26

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27

GGH:076/Harrell1595.10b

28
1