O'Neal v. Amah et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/2/2014 GRANTING defendants' request to withdraw their 11 motion to revoke plaintiff's ifp status; and defendants are GRANTED 30 days to file a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GLENN DAVID O’NEAL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:14-cv-1597 KJN P ORDER CHAPLAIN AMAH, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On October 16, 2014, defendants 18 filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and to dismiss this action. Plaintiff 19 filed an opposition. On November 25, 2014, defendants filed a reply in which they acknowledge 20 that one of the cases on which they relied, O’Neal v. Solis, Case No. 1:12-cv-1299 RRB (E.D. 21 Cal.), is currently on appeal in the Ninth Circuit, Case No. 13-16832, and therefore cannot count 22 as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 13 at 1.) Therefore, defendants withdraw their 23 motion, and ask the court to refrain from requiring an answer inasmuch as they intend to file a 24 motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Good cause 25 appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. Defendants’ request to withdraw their motion to revoke (ECF No. 11) is granted; 27 2. Defendants are granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a motion 28 for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff’s opposition shall 1 be filed twenty-one days after service of the motion, and defendants’ reply shall be filed seven 2 days thereafter. 3 Dated: December 2, 2014 4 5 /onea1597.36 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?