O'Neal v. Amah et al
Filing
38
ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/22/16 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 3/25/16 37 are ADOPTED in full; Defendant's MOTION to Revoke Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status 29 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status (ECF No. 4 ) is revoked; and Plaintiff is ordered to pay the $400.00 filing fee within thirty days from the filed date of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GLENN DAVID O’NEAL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1597 GEB KJN P
v.
ORDER
CHAPLAIN AMAH, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 25, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 25, 2016, are adopted in full;
27
28
////
1
1
2
2. Defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status (ECF No. 29) is
granted;
3
3. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status (ECF No. 4) is revoked; and
4
4. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the $400.00 filing fee within thirty days from the filed date
5
of this order.
6
Dated: April 22, 2016
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?