O'Neal v. Amah et al
Filing
39
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/10/16 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GLENN DAVID O’NEAL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:14-cv-1597 GEB KJN P
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPLAIN AMAH, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
By an order filed April 26, 2016, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status was revoked, and
18
plaintiff was ordered to pay the $400.00 filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff was
19
cautioned that failure to pay the filing fee would result in a recommendation that this action be
20
dismissed. (ECF No. 37 at 6.) Thirty days have now passed, and plaintiff has not responded to
21
the court’s order and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
22
RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
23
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
24
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
25
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
26
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
27
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
28
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
1
1
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
2
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: June 10, 2016
4
5
6
onea1597.fpf
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?