Global Comminity Monitor, et al v. Mammoth Pacific, LP et al
Filing
66
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/6/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff Global Community Monitor is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), each party to bear its own costs and fees. (Reader, L)
1
6
Richard T. Drury (State Bar No. 163559)
Michael R. Lozeau (State Bar No. 142893)
Douglas J. Chermak (State Bar No. 233382)
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
410 12th Street, Suite 250
Oakland, California 94607
Tel: (510) 836-4200; Fax: (510) 836-4205
E-mail: richard@lozeaudrury.com
E-mail: doug@lozeaudrury.com
7
Attorneys for all Plaintiffs
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GLOBAL COMMUNITY MONITOR, a
California nonprofit corporation;
LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL UNION
OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL UNION
NO. 783, an organized labor union;
RANDAL SIPES, JR., an individual;
RUSSEL COVINGTON, an individual,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
16
17
18
Case No. 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN
ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF
GLOBAL COMMUNITY MONITOR
Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
vs.
MAMMOTH PACIFIC, L.P., a California
Limited Partnership; ORMAT NEVADA,
INC., a Delaware Corporation; ORMAT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES I – X, inclusive,
19
Defendants.
20
This matter came before the Court by stipulation of all parties. ECF No. 56. Pursuant to
21
22
FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) all parties stipulated and agreed that all claims by PLAINTIFF
23
GLOBAL COMMUNITY MONITOR (“GCM”) as set forth in its Complaint filed in Case
24
No. 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN are dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs
25
and fees.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
The Parties’ joint stipulation is GRANTED. The Dismissal of GCM’s claims does not
2
affect the rights of the remaining Plaintiffs to continue to litigate the claims set forth in the
3
Complaint.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 6, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?