Global Comminity Monitor, et al v. Mammoth Pacific, LP et al

Filing 74

ORDER granting the Stipulation and Proposed Order Setting Revised Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions (ECF No. 72). Signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/17/2016. (Deutsch, S)

1
2
3
4

MATTHEW B. HIPPLER (Cal. Bar No. 212036)
HOLLAND & HART LLP
5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor
Reno, NV 89511
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10

HOLLAND & HART LLP

222 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 2200
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101

11

STEVEN G. JONES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
EMILY C. SCHILLING (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
HOLLAND & HART LLP
222 So. Main Street, Suite 2200
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17
18

GLOBAL COMMUNITY MONITOR, a
California nonprofit corporation;
LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL
UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL
UNION NO. 783, an organized labor
union; RANDAL SIPES, JR., an
individual; RUSSEL COVINGTON, an
individual;

19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MAMMOTH PACIFIC, L.P., a California
Limited Partnership; ORMAT NEVADA,
INC., a Delaware Corporation; ORMAT
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES I-X, inclusive,
Defendants.

Case No. 2:14-cv-01612-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING
REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr.

RECITALS

1
2

1.

On June 20, 2016, the Court signed a Stipulation and Order (Dkt. No. 63) setting briefing

3

schedules for Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Their Complaint and the parties’ Dispositive

4

Motions.

5

2.

That Stipulation and Order provided that, in the event the Court issued a decision on the

6

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint after August 5, 2016, the briefing schedule

7

for the parties’ Dispositive Motions would be extended by the number of days between August 5, 2016

8

and the date of the Court’s decision, and that the parties’ Dispositive Motions would be noted for the

9

next available hearing date on the Court’s calendar. See Dkt. No. 63 at 3:17-22.

10

HOLLAND & HART LLP

222 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 2200
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101

11

3.

The Court issued a Memorandum and Order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File

Amended Complaint on August 11, 2016. (Dkt No. 70).
STIPULATION

12
13

Applying on the terms of the Court’s June 20, 2016 Order, and extending the schedule by a

14

week based on the date the Court issued its Memorandum and Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for

15

Leave to File Amended Complaint, the schedule for the Parties’ Dispositive Motions is amended as

16

follows:

17

August 18, 2016:

Initial dispositive motions filed;

18

September 8, 2016:

Opposition briefs and any cross-motions due;

19

September 22, 2016:

Reply briefs and opposition to cross-motions due;

20

October 6, 2016:

Reply briefs on cross-motions (if any) due;

21

October 20, 2016:

Hearing on dispositive motions and cross-motions (if any).

22
23
24
25
26
27

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING MODIFIED BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS - 2

1

So Stipulated this 17th day of August, 2016:

2

HOLLAND & HART LLP

3

5

s/ Steven G. Jones
MATTHEW HIPPLER
STEVEN G. JONES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
EMILY C. SCHILLING (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

6

Attorneys for Defendants

7

LOZEAU | DRURY

8

s/ Meredith Wilensky
RICHARD DRURY
DOUGLAS CHERMAK
MEREDITH WILENSKY

4

9
10

HOLLAND & HART LLP

222 SO. MAIN STREET, SUITE 2200
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84101

11

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

ORDER
Based on the parties’ Stipulation as outlined above, the Court enters the following Order:
1.

The Court modifies the briefing schedule for the parties’ Dispositive Motions as follows:

August 18, 2016:

Initial dispositive motions filed;

September 8, 2016:

Opposition briefs and any cross-motions due;

September 22, 2016:

Reply briefs and opposition to cross-motions due;

October 6, 2016:

Reply briefs on cross-motions (if any) due;

October 20, 2016:

Hearing on dispositive motions and cross-motions (if any).

2.

Apart from the modification of the briefing schedule on the parties’ Dispositive Motions

outlined above, all other deadlines established in the Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt No. 31)
remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 17, 2016
_______________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING MODIFIED BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS - 3