Tatum v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER 23 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/11/2015. Plaintiff's time to file a Reply in support of 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 8/14/2015. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 PETER E. BRIXIE, Bar #124186 Attorney at Law 410 Twelfth Street, Suite One Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 658-1880 Fax: (916) 658-1884 peterbrixie@gmail.com Attorney for FREDERICK TATUM 6 7 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FREDRICK TATUM, 10 PLAINTIFF, 11 12 VS. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 13 Case No.: 2:14-CV-01622-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT DEFENDANT 14 15 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 16 undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court as evidenced below, that the 17 Plaintiff’s time to file a reply in support of plaintiff’s motion summary judgement in the above18 referenced case is hereby extended to the new filing date of August 14, 2015. The extension is 19 needed due to press of business in plaintiff’s attorney’s office. 20 21 22 23 24 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT - 1 1 This is the 1st request for extension by Plaintiff. 2 3 Dated: 08/10/15 /s/ Peter Brixie PETER E. BRIXIE Attorney at Law Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 Dated: 08/10/15 By: 6 7 8 9 /s/ Ellinor R. Coder ELLINOR R. CODER Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant __ooo__ APPROVED AND SO ORDERED 10 11 12 Dated: August 11, 2015 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION SUMMARY JUDGEMENT - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?