Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/18/15 re: 16 ORDERING the new date for filing defendant's motion for summary judgment as 7/17/2015. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration JEFFREY CHEN, CSBN 260516 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8939 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: Jeffrey.Chen@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 MATTHEW MURPHY, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 18 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 19 Defendant. 20 ) No. 2:14-cv-01634-DAD ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A ) FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and 22 with the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to 23 file her motion for summary judgment. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time 24 because of a heavy workload despite due diligence. 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 1 The new due date for Defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be Friday, July 17, 1 2 2015. 3 Respectfully submitted, 4 5 Date: June 17, 2015 6 JESSE S. KAPLAN By: 7 8 9 Date: June 17, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 10 By: 11 12 13 /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan* JESSE S. KAPLAN * By email authorization on June 16, 2015 Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Jeffrey Chen JEFFREY CHEN Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 14 15 16 ORDER 17 18 19 20 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 18, 2015 21 22 23 24 25 Ddad1\orders.soc sec murphy1634.stip.eot.ord.doc 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?