Stevens v. John Doe 1-3

Filing 7

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/25/14 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case; it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JIMMY D. STEVENS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-1643-EFB P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHN DOE 1-3, Supervisors, United States Postal Service, Sacramento, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in a civil action. On July 21, 18 19 2014, the postal service returned documents directed to plaintiff as “undeliverable, not deliverable 20 as addressed.” A party appearing without counsel must keep the court and all parties apprised of 21 his current address. L.R. 183(b). If mail directed to a plaintiff is returned by the postal service 22 and plaintiff fails to notify the court and opposing parties within 63 days thereafter of her current 23 address, the court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Id. More 24 than 63 days have passed since the postal service returned the mail and plaintiff has not notified 25 the court of his current address. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United 26 27 States District Judge to this case. 28 ///// 1 1 2 Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110, 183(b). 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 8 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 9 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: September 25, 2014. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?