Ashanti v. Obama et al
Filing
70
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/18/2016 DENYING 64 Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ASKIA ASHANTI,
12
13
14
15
No. 2: 14-cv-1644 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
BARACK OBAMA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On January 7, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the April 29, 2015 and
18
August 7, 2015 orders by the Magistrate Judge (see ECF Nos. 34, 44) denying plaintiff’s requests
19
to change the names in the court caption. (ECF No. 64.) Plaintiff also seeks reconsideration of
20
the January 20, 2015 order by the Magistrate Judge (see ECF No. 25) dismissing plaintiff’s
21
second amended complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 64.) Plaintiff also requests that the
22
court issue a scheduling order and appoint counsel. (Id.)
23
Plaintiff’s request for issuance of a scheduling order and for appointment of counsel
24
should be addressed to the magistrate judge rather than the undersigned. See 28 U.S. C. § 636(c),
25
Eastern District Local Rule 302. Accordingly, these requests are disregarded.
26
Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge on August 21, 2014. (ECF
27
No. 6.) The undersigned was appointed to this action on August 13, 2015, after defendants failed
28
to consent to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction. (ECF No. 46.) Thus, plaintiff had consented to
1
1
the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction at the time the magistrate judge issued the orders denying his
2
requests to change the names in the court caption and dismissing plaintiff’s second amended
3
complaint. Under these circumstances, plaintiff cannot reconsideration of these orders to the
4
undersigned.
5
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 7, 2016 motion for
reconsideration, etc. (ECF No. 64) is denied.
7
8
9
10
DATED: 2/18/2016
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?