Ashanti v. Obama et al

Filing 70

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/18/2016 DENYING 64 Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ASKIA ASHANTI, 12 13 14 15 No. 2: 14-cv-1644 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BARACK OBAMA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On January 7, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the April 29, 2015 and 18 August 7, 2015 orders by the Magistrate Judge (see ECF Nos. 34, 44) denying plaintiff’s requests 19 to change the names in the court caption. (ECF No. 64.) Plaintiff also seeks reconsideration of 20 the January 20, 2015 order by the Magistrate Judge (see ECF No. 25) dismissing plaintiff’s 21 second amended complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 64.) Plaintiff also requests that the 22 court issue a scheduling order and appoint counsel. (Id.) 23 Plaintiff’s request for issuance of a scheduling order and for appointment of counsel 24 should be addressed to the magistrate judge rather than the undersigned. See 28 U.S. C. § 636(c), 25 Eastern District Local Rule 302. Accordingly, these requests are disregarded. 26 Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge on August 21, 2014. (ECF 27 No. 6.) The undersigned was appointed to this action on August 13, 2015, after defendants failed 28 to consent to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction. (ECF No. 46.) Thus, plaintiff had consented to 1 1 the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction at the time the magistrate judge issued the orders denying his 2 requests to change the names in the court caption and dismissing plaintiff’s second amended 3 complaint. Under these circumstances, plaintiff cannot reconsideration of these orders to the 4 undersigned. 5 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 7, 2016 motion for reconsideration, etc. (ECF No. 64) is denied. 7 8 9 10 DATED: 2/18/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?