Ashanti v. Obama et al

Filing 97

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/25/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 88 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion is due within thirty days of the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

ASKIA ASHANTI,

7
8
9
10

No. 2:14-cv-1644 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

BARACK OBAMA, et al.,
Defendants.

11
12

On June 24, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s motion to

13

compel. Pursuant to the mailbox rule, on July 15, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for

14

reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states “rulings by Magistrate Judges . . . shall be

15

final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date

16

of service of the ruling on the parties.” Id. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the

17

magistrate judge’s order of June 24, 2016 is therefore untimely.

18

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

19

1. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 88) is denied;

20

2. Plaintiff’s opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion is due within thirty

21
22

days of the date of this order.
DATED: August 25, 2016

23

/s/ John A. Mendez________________________

24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

25
26
27
28