Johnson v. Tower Energy Group
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/22/14: Initial Scheduling Conference reset for 11/10/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Manzer, C)
1 ELKINS KALT WEINTRAUB REUBEN GARTSIDE LLP
ERIC J. LORENZINI, State Bar No. 218433
elorenzini@elkinskalt.com
2049 Century Park East, Suite 2700
3 Los Angeles, California 90067-3202
Telephone: 310.746.4400
4 Facsimile: 310.746.4499
2
5 Attorneys for Defendant Tower Energy
6
Group
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2049 Century Park East, Suite 2700
Los Angeles, California 90067-3202
Telephone: 310.746.4400 • Facsimile: 310.746.4499
ELKINS KALT WEINTRAUB REUBEN GARTSIDE LLP
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
SCOTT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
TOWER ENERGY GROUP, a
CASE No. 2:14-CV-01647-GEB-EFB
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE
15 California Corporation, and DOES 1-
[Stipulation filed concurrently herewith]
16
Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr
Crtrm.: 10
10, inclusive,
Defendants.
17
Action Filed: July 14, 2014
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
412142v1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE
ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel, and for good cause appearing, the Court
orders that the status conference currently scheduled for October 27, 2014 at 9:00
A.M. in Courtroom 10 shall be continued to November 10, 2014 at 9:00 A.M. in
Courtroom 10.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 22, 2014
2049 Century Park East, Suite 2700
Los Angeles, California 90067-3202
Telephone: 310.746.4400 • Facsimile: 310.746.4499
ELKINS KALT WEINTRAUB REUBEN GARTSIDE LLP
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
412142v1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?