Rabon et al v. National Default Servicing Corporation et al
Filing
20
ORDER denying 16 Motion to Quash signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/17/14. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EUGENE RABON, REGINA RABON,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-1660 JAM DAD PS
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING
CORPORATION,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiffs Eugene Rabon and Regina Rabon are proceeding pro se in the above entitled
19
action. Accordingly, the case has been referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule
20
302(c)(21).
21
A motion to quash service and motion to dismiss brought on behalf of defendant Real
22
Time Resolutions, Inc. is scheduled for hearing before the undersigned on Friday October 24,
23
2014. (Dkt. No. 16.) However, on September 29, 2014, the undersigned issued findings and
24
recommendation, recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiffs’ failure to
25
prosecute. (Dkt. No. 19.) The time for the filing of objections to those findings and
26
recommendations has expired, no objections have been filed and the findings and
27
recommendations are now pending before the assigned District Judge. If the assigned District
28
Judge adopts those findings and recommendation in full, this matter will be dismissed.
1
1
Accordingly, defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.’s motion to dismiss will be denied
2
without prejudice to being re-noticed for hearing before the undersigned in the event the assigned
3
District Judge does not adopt the pending findings and recommendations in full and this matter is
4
not dismissed.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s September 19, 2014 motion to
6
dismiss (Dkt. No. 16) is denied without prejudice and dropped from the October 24, 2014 law and
7
motion calendar.
8
Dated: October 17, 2014
9
10
11
12
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\rabon1660.mtd.ord.docx
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?