Sassman v. Brown et al
Filing
98
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/30/2015 ORDERING 97 that the deadline for Plaintiff to file his application for attorneys' fees and costs is hereby EXTENDED up to and including 1/11/2016. (Reader, L)
1 GAY CROSTHWAIT GRUNFELD – 121944
BLAKE THOMPSON – 255600
2 VAN SWEARINGEN – 259809
ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
3 50 Fremont Street, 19th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2235
4 Telephone: (415) 433-6830
Facsimile: (415) 433-7104
ggrunfeld@rbgg.com
5 Email:
bthompson@rbgg.com
vswearingen@rbgg.com
6
7 CAROL STRICKMAN – 078341
LEGAL SERVICES FOR PRISONERS WITH CHILDREN
8 1540 Market Street, Suite 490
San Francisco, California 94102
9 Telephone: (415) 255-7036
Facsimile: (415) 552-3150
carol@prisonerswithchildren.org
10 Email:
11 Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
16
17 WILLIAM A. SASSMAN,
Plaintiff,
18
19
v.
20 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. Governor of
California, and JEFFREY A. BEARD,
21 Secretary of the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation, in their
22 official capacities, and DOES 1-10,
23
Case No. 2:14-cv-01679-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FEE
APPLICATION
Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
Crtrm: 7, 14th Floor
Trial Date:
None Set
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
[2890361-1]
2:14-cv-01679-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FEE APPLICATION
1
WHEREAS, the Court entered its Memorandum and Order (Dkt. No. 77) granting
2 summary judgment for Plaintiff William Sassman (“Plaintiff”) on September 9, 2015, and
3 issued a Judgment (Dkt. No. 78) in favor of Plaintiff on that same date; and
4
WHEREAS, on September 28, 2015, per the parties’ stipulation, the Court ordered
5 that the deadline for Plaintiff to file his application for attorneys’ fees and costs be set for
6 December 4, 2015 (Dkt No. 82);
7
WHEREAS, the parties have begun negotiations regarding a potential settlement of
8 Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs, which could obviate the need for the Court to
9 adjudicate a fee motion in this case. However, the parties do not believe that the
10 December 4, 2015 deadline will provide sufficient time for a formal resolution to be
11 reached to avoid the need for Plaintiff to prepare his application; and
12
WHEREAS, the parties to the above-captioned case, through their counsel of
13 record, have therefore agreed to a short extension of the time to submit an application for
14 attorneys’ fees and costs, in an effort to attempt to resolve this matter without the need for
15 a fee application to the Court;
16
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and
17 between the parties, through their counsel of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension
18 of time up to and including January 11, 2016, in which to submit an application for
19 attorneys’ fees and costs. By entering into this stipulation, Defendants do not waive their
20 right to appeal or the right to object to costs or attorneys’ fees.
21
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
22
23 DATED: November 19, 2015
ROSEN BIEN GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP
24
25
By: /s/ Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld
Gay Crosthwait Grunfeld
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff
27
28
[2890361-1]
2:14-cv-01679-MCE-KJN
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FEE APPLICATION
1 DATED: November 19, 2015
2
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
By: /s/ Martine N. D’Agostino
Martine N. D’Agostino
Deputy Attorney General
3
4
5
Attorneys for Defendants
Edmund G. Brown Jr. and Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D.
6
7
8
9
ORDER
The Court, having reviewed the above stipulation of the parties, and good cause
10 appearing, hereby orders that the deadline for Plaintiff to file his application for attorneys’
11 fees and costs is hereby extended up to and including January 11, 2016.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13 Dated: November 30, 2015
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[2890361-1]
2:14-cv-01679-MCE-KJN
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FEE APPLICATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?