Davis v. Lira

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/17/14 ORDERING that this action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY DAVIS, 12 No. 2:14-cv-1681 AC P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 D. LIRA, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 On September 29, 2014, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, 17 18 within thirty days, the USM-285 form necessary to effect service on the defendant.1 ECF No. 7. 19 Plaintiff was also directed to complete a summons and return two copies of the July 16, 2014 20 complaint. Id. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any 21 way to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the September 29th order was 22 23 returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court 24 apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents 25 at the record address of the party is fully effective. 26 //// 27 28 1 On July 31. 2014, plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. ECF No. 6. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 2 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 DATED: November 17, 2014 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?