Cerda v. Sacramento City Police K-9 Division

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/15/2014 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ORLANDO CERDA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-1712 KJN P

v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE K-9
DIVISION,
Defendants.

16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff consented to proceed

17
18

before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed October 24,

19

2014, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why this action should not be

20

dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise

21

responded to the court’s order.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff

22
23

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current

24

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of

25

the party is fully effective.

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

2

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

3

Dated: December 15, 2014

4
5

/cerd1712.fsc

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2