Cerda v. Sacramento City Police K-9 Division

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/7/16 ORDERING that this action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ORLANDO CERDA,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-1712 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE K-9
DIVISION,
Defendants.

16
17
18

Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.

19

§ 636(c). By order filed November 24, 2015, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and

20

twenty-eight days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. Twenty-eight days

21

from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint, or

22

otherwise responded to the court’s order.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

24

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

Dated: January 7, 2016

26
27
cerd1712..fta

28
1