Cerda v. Sacramento City Police K-9 Division

Filing 9

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/24/14 ORDERING that within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ORLANDO CERDA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-1712 KJN P

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

SACRAMENTO CITY POLICE K-9
DIVISION,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff consented to proceed before the

18

undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed September 19, 2014,

19

plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was

20

granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint

21

or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff

22
23

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current

24

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of

25

the party is fully effective.

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this

2

order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. See

3

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

4

Dated: October 24, 2014

5
6

/cerd1712.osc

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2