Tedford et al v. Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/18/2015 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Russell A. Wyatt, Esq. (SBN 283293)
LAW OFFICE OF RUSS WYATT
901 H St., Suite 207
Sacramento, CA 95814
Tel: (916) 277-8820
Facsimile: (877) 631-2544
Email: russwyatt@russwyattlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
GARY TEDFORD AND VICTORIA TEDFORD
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
GARY TEDFORD AND VICTORIA
TEDFORD,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC.;
SAGE POINT LENDER SERVICES, LLC;
and DOES 1-20, Inclusive,
DEFENDANTS.
CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01715-MCE-CKD
The Hon. Morrison C. England Jr.
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(2)
Action Filed: May 28, 2014
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01715-MCE-CKD
PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
1
1
2
3
4
THIS MATTER having been submitted to the above-entitled Court per Plaintiffs’ Notice
of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice with respect to all claims against named Defendants
Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. and Sage Point Lender Services, LLC (“Defendants”), and
after consideration of the grounds set forth in the same, the Court HEREBY GRANTS, upon
5
6
7
8
9
terms proper, Plaintiffs’ request for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to all claims in
the above-entitled action against the aforementioned named Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 18, 2015
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01715-MCE-CKD
PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT
PREJUDICE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?