Tedford et al v. Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/18/2015 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2). CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Russell A. Wyatt, Esq. (SBN 283293) LAW OFFICE OF RUSS WYATT 901 H St., Suite 207 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel: (916) 277-8820 Facsimile: (877) 631-2544 Email: russwyatt@russwyattlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs, GARY TEDFORD AND VICTORIA TEDFORD 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 GARY TEDFORD AND VICTORIA TEDFORD, PLAINTIFFS, v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC.; SAGE POINT LENDER SERVICES, LLC; and DOES 1-20, Inclusive, DEFENDANTS. CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01715-MCE-CKD The Hon. Morrison C. England Jr. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(2) Action Filed: May 28, 2014 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01715-MCE-CKD PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 1 2 3 4 THIS MATTER having been submitted to the above-entitled Court per Plaintiffs’ Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice with respect to all claims against named Defendants Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. and Sage Point Lender Services, LLC (“Defendants”), and after consideration of the grounds set forth in the same, the Court HEREBY GRANTS, upon 5 6 7 8 9 terms proper, Plaintiffs’ request for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to all claims in the above-entitled action against the aforementioned named Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 18, 2015 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01715-MCE-CKD PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?