Mazzei v. Davis
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/9/2014 GRANTING petitioner's 6 motion; petitioner's consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge is deemed WITHDRAWN; and the Clerk shall assign a district jduge to this case. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL MAZZEI,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1720 KJN P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
RON DAVIS, WARDEN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On August 8, 2014, petitioner
18
filed a motion to rescind his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. Petitioner claims that
19
he rushed to submit the court’s form, signed July 29, 2014, and made a mistake by consenting to
20
the undersigned.
21
Since this action has not yet been reassigned to the undersigned, petitioner may withdraw
22
his consent without demonstrating good cause or extraordinary circumstances. See 28 U.S.C.
23
§ 636(c); Dixon v. Ylst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir. 1993) (“Once a civil case is referred to a
24
magistrate judge under section 636(c), the reference can be withdrawn by the court only ‘for good
25
cause shown on its own motion, or under extraordinary circumstances show by any party.’”).
26
Accordingly, in the interests of justice, the court grants petitioner's request to rescind his
27
consent, and his consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge is deemed withdrawn. See
28
Bowman v. Schwarzenegger, 2009 WL 799274, *1 (E.D. Cal. March 23, 2009).
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 6) is granted;
3
2. Petitioner’s consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge is deemed withdrawn;
4
5
6
and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case.
Dated: September 9, 2014
7
8
/mazz1720.wd
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?