Garfil v. Dell Financial Services, LLC
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER 14 for continuance signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/2/2014. Initial Scheduling Conference is RE-SET for 1/26/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). Parties shall file Joint Status Report no later than 14 days prior to Scheduling Conference. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930)
bwisoff@fbm.com
Alexander M. Porcaro (State Bar No. 281185)
aporcaro@fbm.com
Farella Braun + Martel LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 954-4400
Facsimile:
(415) 954-4480
Attorneys for Defendant
DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA
10
EASTERN DISTRICT
11
12
FLOSERFIDA GARFIL,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 14-cv-01729-GEB-AC
Plaintiff,
JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
(L.R. 144, 240)
v.
DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC,
foreign limited liability company; and DOES
1 to 10, inclusive,
Complaint filed:
July 22, 2014
Current response date: December 31, 2014
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
Plaintiff FLOSERFIDA GARFIL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant DELL FINANCIAL
21
SERVICES, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree as
22
follows:
23
WHEREAS, pursuant to Court order dated July 23, 2014, an Initial Scheduling
24
Conference was initially scheduled for October 27, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., with the parties to file a
25
Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report by October 13, 2014;
26
WHEREAS, pursuant to joint request and Court minute order dated October 16, 2014,
27
the Initial Scheduling Conference was continued to December 15, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., with the
28
parties to file a Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report by December 1, 2014;
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE
INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Case No. 14-cv-01729-GEB-AC
-1-
30674\4644099.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation and Court order entered on October 31, 2014, the
time for Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s complaint was extended to December 31, 2014;
WHEREAS, Defendant has not yet responded to Plaintiff’s complaint or generally
appeared in this action;
WHEREAS, the parties are engaged in ongoing settlement discussions and wish to
continue those discussions before they prepare a Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report;
WHEREAS, the parties also are discussing amending the pleadings and possible
arbitration if this matter should not settle;
WHEREAS, Defendant’s counsel Alexander M. Porcaro will be traveling outside the
United States from November 19, 2014 through December 7, 2014; and
WHEREAS both parties agree that good cause exists to continue the Initial Scheduling
Conference to a convenient date after January 14, 2014;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND JOINTLY REQUEST
THAT the Court continue the Initial Scheduling Conference to a convenient date after January
14, 2014.
16
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
17
18
Dated: November 14, 2014
19
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
By: /s/ Alexander M. Porcaro
Alexander M. Porcaro
20
Attorneys for Defendant
DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC
21
22
23
Dated: November 14, 2014
24
PRICE LAW GROUP, APC
By: /s/ Stuart M. Price (as authorized on Nov. 14, 2014)
Stuart M. Price
25
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FLOSERFIDA GARFIL
26
27
28
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE
INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Case No. 14-cv-01729-GEB-AC
-2-
30674\4644099.1
1
2
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Based upon the joint request of Plaintiff FLOSERFIDA GARFIL and Defendant DELL
FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
4
5
1.
a.m.
6
7
8
The Initial Scheduling Conference has been reset to January 26, 2015, at 9:00
2.
The parties shall file a Joint Status Report not later than fourteen (14) days prior
to the Initial Scheduling Conference.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 2, 2014
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE
INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Case No. 14-cv-01729-GEB-AC
-3-
30674\4644099.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?