Garfil v. Dell Financial Services, LLC

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER 14 for continuance signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/2/2014. Initial Scheduling Conference is RE-SET for 1/26/2015 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB). Parties shall file Joint Status Report no later than 14 days prior to Scheduling Conference. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930) bwisoff@fbm.com Alexander M. Porcaro (State Bar No. 281185) aporcaro@fbm.com Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 Attorneys for Defendant DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DISTRICT 11 12 FLOSERFIDA GARFIL, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 14-cv-01729-GEB-AC Plaintiff, JOINT REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (L.R. 144, 240) v. DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, foreign limited liability company; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Complaint filed: July 22, 2014 Current response date: December 31, 2014 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff FLOSERFIDA GARFIL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant DELL FINANCIAL 21 SERVICES, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree as 22 follows: 23 WHEREAS, pursuant to Court order dated July 23, 2014, an Initial Scheduling 24 Conference was initially scheduled for October 27, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., with the parties to file a 25 Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report by October 13, 2014; 26 WHEREAS, pursuant to joint request and Court minute order dated October 16, 2014, 27 the Initial Scheduling Conference was continued to December 15, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., with the 28 parties to file a Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report by December 1, 2014; STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Case No. 14-cv-01729-GEB-AC -1- 30674\4644099.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation and Court order entered on October 31, 2014, the time for Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s complaint was extended to December 31, 2014; WHEREAS, Defendant has not yet responded to Plaintiff’s complaint or generally appeared in this action; WHEREAS, the parties are engaged in ongoing settlement discussions and wish to continue those discussions before they prepare a Rule 26(f) Joint Status Report; WHEREAS, the parties also are discussing amending the pleadings and possible arbitration if this matter should not settle; WHEREAS, Defendant’s counsel Alexander M. Porcaro will be traveling outside the United States from November 19, 2014 through December 7, 2014; and WHEREAS both parties agree that good cause exists to continue the Initial Scheduling Conference to a convenient date after January 14, 2014; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND JOINTLY REQUEST THAT the Court continue the Initial Scheduling Conference to a convenient date after January 14, 2014. 16 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 17 18 Dated: November 14, 2014 19 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP By: /s/ Alexander M. Porcaro Alexander M. Porcaro 20 Attorneys for Defendant DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC 21 22 23 Dated: November 14, 2014 24 PRICE LAW GROUP, APC By: /s/ Stuart M. Price (as authorized on Nov. 14, 2014) Stuart M. Price 25 Attorneys for Plaintiff FLOSERFIDA GARFIL 26 27 28 STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Case No. 14-cv-01729-GEB-AC -2- 30674\4644099.1 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER Based upon the joint request of Plaintiff FLOSERFIDA GARFIL and Defendant DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 4 5 1. a.m. 6 7 8 The Initial Scheduling Conference has been reset to January 26, 2015, at 9:00 2. The parties shall file a Joint Status Report not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Initial Scheduling Conference. 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2014 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE Case No. 14-cv-01729-GEB-AC -3- 30674\4644099.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?