Garfil v. Dell Financial Services, LLC

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/22/2015 ORDERING that dispositional documents re 19 Notice of Settlement be filed by 2/24/2015; WARNING all parties that a failure to respond to this deadline may be construed as consent to dismiss al of this action without prejudice [See E.D. Cal. R. 160(b)]; CONTINUING the Status Conference to 3/23/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; ORDERING that a joint status report be filed fourteen (14) days before the Status Conference. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FLOSERFIDA GARFIL, 8 9 10 No. 2:14-cv-01729-GEB-AC Plaintiff, v. 11 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 12 ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION Defendants. 13 Plaintiff filed a “Notice of Settlement” on January 15, 14 15 2015, in which she states: 16 Plaintiff has settled her case with Defendant, DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive. The parties are in the process of finalizing settlement, and Plaintiff anticipates the settlement will be finalized in 40 days. Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court vacate all dates currently set on calendar for this case. 17 18 19 20 21 (Notice of Settlement, ECF No. 19.) 22 Therefore, a dispositional document shall be filed no 23 later than February 24, 2015. Failure to respond by this deadline 24 may be construed as consent to dismissal of this action without 25 prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. See E.D. Cal. R. 26 160(b) 27 prescribed by the Court may be grounds for sanctions.”). (“A failure to file dispositional 28 1 papers on the date 1 Further, the Status Conference scheduled for hearing on 2 January 26, 2015, is continued to commence at 9:00 a.m. on March 3 23, 2015, in the event no dispositional document is filed, or if 4 this action is not otherwise dismissed.1 5 shall be filed fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference. 6 7 A joint status report IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 22, 2015 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The status conference will remain on calendar, because the mere representation that a case has been settled does not justify vacating a scheduling proceeding. Cf. Callie v. Near, 829 F.2d 888, 890 (9th Cir. 1987) (indicating that a representation that claims have been settled does not necessarily establish the existence of a binding settlement agreement). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?