Wilson v. Lassiter et al

Filing 12

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/23/15 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID W. WILSON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-1747 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS K.L. LASSITER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 23, 2014, the Honorable William B. Shubb denied plaintiff’s 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis and directed plaintiff to pay the filing fee within thirty 20 days. (ECF No. 7.) On March 9, 2015, Judge Shubb denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration 21 and ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 11.) 22 Thirty days passed from March 9, 2015 and plaintiff did not pay the filing fee. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for 24 plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 1 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: April 23, 2015 5 6 7 8 Wil1747.fr 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?