Wilson v. Lassiter et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/30/15 ORDERING that Plaintiff's objections, construed as MOTION for Reconsideration 8 is DENIED; Plaintiff is GRANTED thirty days from the date of this order to pay the filing fee; failure to pay the filing fee will result in a dismissal of this action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID W. WILSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2: 14-cv-1747 WBS KJN P v. ORDER K.L. LASSITER et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On September 23, 2014, the undersigned denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 17 18 pauperis and ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 7.) On October 19 15, 2014, plaintiff filed objections to the September 23, 2014 order. (ECF No. 8.) The 20 undersigned construes plaintiff’s objections as a request for reconsideration. Three grounds may justify reconsideration: (1) an intervening change in controlling law; 21 22 (2) the availability of new evidence; or (3) the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest 23 injustice. Kern-Tulare Water Dist. v. City of Bakersfield, 634 F.Supp. 656, 665 (E.D. Cal. 1986), 24 rev’d in part on other grounds, 828 F.2d 514 (9th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1015 (1988). In his objections, plaintiff does not cite any intervening change in controlling law, new 25 26 evidence or grounds demonstrating the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice. 27 Most of plaintiff’s objections are devoted to arguments based on pre-existing case law. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s objections, construed as a motion for reconsideration, are denied; 3 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to pay the filing fee; failure to 4 pay the filing fee will result in a dismissal of this action. 5 Dated: January 30, 2015 6 7 8 9 10 11 Will747.req 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?