National Roofing Industry Pension Plan et al v. Fryer Roofing Co., Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/28/2015. Judgment is ENTERED against defendant Fryer Roofing in the amount of $74,800.00 and Clerk directed to CLOSE this case. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 NATIONAL ROOFING INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 v. No. 14-cv-1765-MCE-KJN ORDER FRYER ROOFING CO., INC., Defendant. 17 18 On March 13, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an Ex Parte Application seeking the entry of 19 judgment against Defendant. ECF No. 13. Plaintiffs’ Application explains that: (1) the 20 parties reached an agreement to settle this case on January 15, 2015; (2) the parties 21 specified the terms and conditions of the settlement in a Settlement Agreement; (3) the 22 Settlement Agreement provided, inter alia, that if Defendant did not pay the stipulated 23 monthly settlement payments in a timely fashion, then Plaintiffs would file a Stipulated 24 Judgment for a total of $81,600 (less any amounts that Defendant may have paid); and 25 (4) Defendant has paid only $6,800 of the $81,600 (and therefore still owes $74,800). 26 On March 16, 2015, the Court issued an order providing Defendant two business 27 days to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application. ECF No. 15. Defendant has 28 not filed an opposition. 1 1 In light of Defendant’s failure to file an opposition and the unambiguous terms of 2 the Settlement Agreement, the Court hereby ORDERS that judgment be entered against 3 Defendant in the amount of $74,800. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this 4 case. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 28, 2015 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?