Lisea v. Sherman
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/27/2014 DISMISSING the petition, without prejudice, to re-filing if and when state remedies are exhausted as to all claims; the Clerk shall close this case; and the court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDUARDO LISEA,
12
No. 2:14-cv-1766 CKD P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
STU SHERMAN,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has consented to this court’s
17
18
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 302. On July 2014, the undersigned
19
determined that the petition in this action was “mixed,” containing both exhausted and
20
unexhausted claims. On September 8, 2014, the undersigned denied petitioner’s motion to stay
21
this action pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). Petitioner was granted thirty days
22
to file an amended petition containing only exhausted claims or face dismissal of this action
23
without prejudice. The thirty days has passed, and petitioner has not filed an amended petition.
24
////
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
2
1. The petition is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing if and when state remedies are
3
exhausted as to all claims;
4
2. The Clerk of Court shall close this case; and
5
3. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
6
Dated: October 27, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
2 / lise1766.ord
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?