Duerst v. Placer Court et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/9/2015 ORDERING that the court certifies that plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith. (cc: USCA) (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RYAN J. DUERST, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-1774 GEB AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER PLACER COURT, ET AL., Defendants. 16 17 On December 4, 2014, this court dismissed plaintiff’s lawsuit without leave to amend, and 18 entered judgment. ECF Nos. 9 & 10. On December 22, 2014, this court denied plaintiff’s motion 19 to alter or amend the judgment. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal (ECF No. 14), 20 and the Ninth Circuit has referred the matter back to this court “for the limited purpose of 21 determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the 22 appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith.” ECF No. 16 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Hooker 23 v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of forma pauperis status is 24 appropriate where district court finds the appeal to be frivolous)). 25 Plaintiff complains about orders entered against him in state Superior Court, including 26 orders for child support and spousal support. He argues that the orders were wrong, and caused 27 him to lose his home. The lawsuit was dismissed because he principally sued judicial officers for 28 1 1 their judicial acts.1 See, e.g., Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 355-56 (1978). This court is 2 aware of no good-faith, non-frivolous basis for an appeal of this ruling, as the complaint contains 3 only complaints about the judicial actions of judicial officers. No other basis for relief is alleged. 4 See Ellis v. U.S., 356 U.S. 674, 675 (1958) (“In the absence of some evident improper motive, the 5 applicant's good faith is established by the presentation of any issue that is not plainly frivolous”). 6 Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3)(A), the 7 court certifies that plaintiff’s appeal is not taken in good faith. 8 Dated: January 9, 2015 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Although plaintiff also named non-judicial officers, he made no allegations against them. 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?