Tenuto v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/3/14 re: 10 ORDERING that Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association shall respond to the Complaint no later than 9/19/14. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 BRYAN CAVE LLP Daniel T. Rockey, California Bar No. 178604 2 Tina L. Naicker, California Bar No. 252766 560 Mission Street, 25th Floor 3 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 675-3400 (415) 675-3434 4 Facsimile: E-mail: daniel.rockey@bryancave.com naickert@bryancave.com 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 7 __________________________ 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRYAN CAVE LLP 560 MISSION STREET, 25TH FL OOR SA N FR A N C I S C O , CA 94105 -2994 10 11 12 13 14 Frank J. Tenuto, Sr., Case No. 2:14-CV-01776-MCE-CKD Plaintiff, v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association; 15 Equifax Information Services LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, 16 Experian Information Solutions, Inc., an Ohio Corporation; and Trans Union LLC, a 17 Delaware limited liability company; 18 Defendants. 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Date Action Filed: Trial Date: July 28, 2014 None Set. 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 10) and Local Rule 144, Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association’s time to respond to respond to the Complaint shall be extended to September 19, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 3, 2014 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?