Tenuto v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/3/14 re: 10 ORDERING that Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association shall respond to the Complaint no later than 9/19/14. (Meuleman, A)
1 BRYAN CAVE LLP
Daniel T. Rockey, California Bar No. 178604
2 Tina L. Naicker, California Bar No. 252766
560 Mission Street, 25th Floor
3 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
(415) 675-3400
(415) 675-3434
4 Facsimile:
E-mail:
daniel.rockey@bryancave.com
naickert@bryancave.com
5
6 Attorneys for Defendant
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
7 __________________________
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRYAN CAVE LLP
560 MISSION STREET, 25TH FL OOR
SA N FR A N C I S C O , CA 94105 -2994
10
11
12
13
14
Frank J. Tenuto, Sr.,
Case No. 2:14-CV-01776-MCE-CKD
Plaintiff,
v.
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association;
15 Equifax Information Services LLC, a Georgia
limited liability company,
16 Experian Information Solutions, Inc., an Ohio
Corporation; and Trans Union LLC, a
17 Delaware limited liability company;
18
Defendants.
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER
GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE
BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT.
Date Action Filed:
Trial Date:
July 28, 2014
None Set.
20
21
22
23
24
25
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 10) and Local Rule 144, Defendant JP
Morgan Chase Bank, National Association’s time to respond to respond to the Complaint shall be
extended to September 19, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 3, 2014
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?