Stanley v. Schmidt et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/23/15 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDREW D. STANLEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-1782 CKD P v. ORDER PAUL SCHMIDT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the 20 undersigned. 21 By an order filed February 23, 2015, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to 22 the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That 23 thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 24 25 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 26 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 27 the party is fully effective. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 Dated: June 23, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 / stan1782.fusm 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?