Stanley v. Schmidt et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/23/15 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDREW D. STANLEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1782 CKD P
v.
ORDER
PAUL SCHMIDT, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the
20
undersigned.
21
By an order filed February 23, 2015, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to
22
the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That
23
thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff
24
25
was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current
26
address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of
27
the party is fully effective.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
2
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
3
Dated: June 23, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
2 / stan1782.fusm
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?