Marquette v. Negouchi et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/2/2014 GRANTING plaintiff's 21 motion for an extension of time; plaintiff has 90 days to submit the necessary documents for service of process; plaintiff's previously filed 19 , 20 motions for extensions of time are DENIED as moot. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT MARQUETTE, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-1790 MCE DAD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER NEGOUCHI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to submit the documents for service pursuant to the court’s order of October 2, 2014. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. Plaintiff motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 21) is granted. 20 2. Plaintiff is granted ninety days from the date of this order in which to submit the 21 22 necessary documents for service of process. 3. Plaintiff’s previously filed motions for extensions of time (Docket Nos. 19 and 20) are 23 denied as moot. 24 Dated: December 2, 2014 25 26 27 28 hm marq1790.eot

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?