Marquette v. Negouchi et al
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/2/2014 GRANTING plaintiff's 21 motion for an extension of time; plaintiff has 90 days to submit the necessary documents for service of process; plaintiff's previously filed 19 , 20 motions for extensions of time are DENIED as moot. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT MARQUETTE,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1790 MCE DAD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
NEGOUCHI, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to submit the documents for service pursuant
to the court’s order of October 2, 2014. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
19
1. Plaintiff motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 21) is granted.
20
2. Plaintiff is granted ninety days from the date of this order in which to submit the
21
22
necessary documents for service of process.
3. Plaintiff’s previously filed motions for extensions of time (Docket Nos. 19 and 20) are
23
denied as moot.
24
Dated: December 2, 2014
25
26
27
28
hm
marq1790.eot
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?