Marquette v. Negouchi et al
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/18/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 53 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's 26 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED as MOOT. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT MARQUETTE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-01790 MCE DAD P
v.
ORDER
NEGOUCHI, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 29, 2015, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations (ECF No.
21
53) that were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the Findings and
22
Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No party has filed objections to the
23
Findings and Recommendations.
Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and
24
25
recommendations was returned as undeliverable, Plaintiff was properly served. It is Plaintiff’s
26
responsibility to keep the Court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local
27
Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
28
///
1
1
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
3
ORDERED that:
4
5
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 29, 2015 (ECF No. 53) are
ADOPTED IN FULL.
6
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 26) is DENIED as moot.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: September 18, 2015
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?