Thao v. On Habeas Corpus
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/30/2014, CASE TRANSFERRRED to SACRAMENTO Division. New Case Number 2:14-cv-1791-KJN (HC). Old Case Number 1:14-cv-01164-GSA (HC).(Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
1:14-cv-01164-GSA (HC)
LUE SENG THAO,
Petitioner,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
v.
ON HABEAS CORPUS,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to
18
28 U.S.C. ' 2254.
19
The petitioner is challenging a conviction from Sacramento County, which is part of the
20
Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
21
Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the Sacramento Division.
22
Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the
23
proper court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this
24
action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
27
28
California sitting in Sacramento; and
1
1
2
2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall
be filed at:
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
3
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 30, 2014
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?