Glosson v. Elliott
Filing
42
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/27/2016 ORDERING that the 35 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Defendant's 20 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. This action shall proceed on plaintiff's deliberate indifference claim against defendant Elliot, as set forth in the operative original 1 complaint. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSEPH LEE GLOSSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1795 JAM AC P
v.
ORDER
T. ELLIOTT,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On September 2, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 2, 2016 are adopted in full;
3
2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20) is denied; and
4
3. This action shall proceed on plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claim against defendant
5
Elliot, as set forth in the operative original complaint, ECF No. 1.
6
DATED: December 27, 2016
7
/s/ John A. Mendez__________________________
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?