Rodriguez v. Swarthout
Filing
3
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/9/14 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this action; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NAHU RODRIGUEZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1803 CKD P
v.
ORDER AND
GARY SWARTHOUT,
15
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed an application for a writ of
17
18
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. (ECF No. 1.)
The court’s records reveal, and petitioner acknowledges, that petitioner has previously
19
20
filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus attacking the conviction and sentence challenged
21
in this case. See Case No. 1:98-cv-6098 REC LJO (E.D. Cal.). The previous application was
22
filed on September 28, 1998, and was denied on the merits on January 22, 2001. Before
23
petitioner can proceed with the instant application, he must move in the United States Court of
24
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for an order authorizing the district court to consider the
25
application. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Therefore, petitioner’s application must be dismissed
26
without prejudice to its refiling upon obtaining authorization from the United States Court of
27
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
28
////
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a
district judge to this action.
3
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
4
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
5
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
6
after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
7
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
8
Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the
9
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
10
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
11
Dated: September 9, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
2 / rodr1803.success_fr
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?