King v. Wang et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/5/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff one blank USM-285 form; Within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit to the court the completed USM-285 form required to effect service. The Clerk of the Court is directed to term plaintiffs Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 12 )(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID KING,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1817 DAD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WANG, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
By an order filed November 6, 2014, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to
20
the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 form and copies of his complaint which are required to
21
effect service on the defendant Wang. On December 24, 2014, plaintiff submitted the copies of
22
the complaint but failed to provide a complete address for the defendant on the USM-285 form.
23
On December 24, 2014, plaintiff also filed a notice with the court, entitled “Amended
24
Complaint,” which provides in pertinent part: “Petitioner respectfully asks that this Court Amend
25
the original complaint to read on page 2 line 10 of the Court’s order, that the incident happened in
26
Unit I Folsom State Prison not at High Desert State Prison.” (ECF No. 12.) It is unclear whether
27
plaintiff is seeking to amend his original complaint or to move the court to alter the wording of its
28
November 6, 2014 order. Page 2, lines 9-11 of that order provides: “In his complaint pending
1
1
before the court, plaintiff alleges that during his incarceration at High Desert State Prison
2
defendants were deliberately indifferent to his need to obtain urgent medical care for a severe
3
toothache.” (ECF No. 8 at 2.) That characterization of plaintiff’s complaint, in turn, was
4
prompted by the fact that plaintiff listed “High Desert State Prison (Custody Level)” as a named
5
defendant on page 1 of his complaint. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) Accordingly, it does not appear to the
6
court that it committed an error in referring to “High Desert State Prison” in its order. If plaintiff
7
wishes to amend his complaint in order to replace the phrase “High Desert State Prison” with the
8
phrase “Unit I Folsom State Prison,” he may seek leave of the court or the defendants’ consent to
9
do so. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). Plaintiff is also cautioned that if he wishes
10
to amend his complaint, he should comply with Local Rule 220, which provides in pertinent part:
11
Unless prior approval to the contrary is obtained from the Court,
every pleading to which an amendment or supplement is permitted
as a matter of right or has been allowed by court order shall be
retyped and filed so that it is complete in itself without reference to
the prior or superseded pleading. No pleading shall be deemed
amended or supplemented until this Rule has been complied with.
All changed pleadings shall contain copies of all exhibits referred to
in the changed pleading
12
13
14
15
16
In the meantime, the court’s November 6, 2014 order will remain unchanged.
17
In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
18
1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff one blank USM-285 form;
19
2. Within thirty days, plaintiff shall submit to the court the completed USM-285 form
20
required to effect service. Failure to return the USM-285 form within the specified time period
21
will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and
22
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to term plaintiff’s “Amended Complaint.” (ECF
23
No. 12.)
24
Dated: January 5, 2015
25
26
27
DAD:10/kly
king1817.8f
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?