King v. Wang et al
Filing
14
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/24/2015 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this action; AND RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID KING,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1817 DAD P
v.
ORDER AND
WANG,
15
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendant.
16
17
By an order filed November 6, 2014, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and return,
18
within thirty days, the USM-285 form and copies of his complaint which are required to effect
19
service on the defendant Wang. On December 24, 2014, plaintiff submitted the copies of the
20
complaint but failed to provide a complete address for defendant Wang on the USM-285 form.
Consequently, by order filed January 6, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and
21
22
return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 form necessary to effect service on defendant
23
Wang, including a complete address. That thirty day period has long since passed, and plaintiff
24
has not responded in any way to the court’s order.
In light of the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall
25
26
randomly assign a district judge to this action.
27
////
28
////
1
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
4
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
5
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
6
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and
7
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
8
may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th
9
Cir. 1991).
10
Dated: March 24, 2015
11
12
13
14
DAD:10
king1817.fusm
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?