King v. Wang et al

Filing 41

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 06/07/17 ordering that defendant Nurse Wang shall file a responsive pleading to the second amended complaint within 14 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID KING, 12 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-1817 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WANG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 19 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 26, 2016, defendant Nurse Wang’s 20 motion to dismiss was granted, and plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. 21 (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint was screened on April 3, 2017, and found to 22 state a claim against Nurse Wang but not against a supervisory defendant named therein. (ECF 23 No. 39.) Plaintiff was then given an option to either proceed on the amended pleading as screened 24 or file a second amended complaint. On April 19, 2017, plaintiff filed a second amended 25 complaint. On review, the undersigned finds that plaintiff has re-asserted the claim against Nurse 26 Wang that was previously found to be viable, and he dismissed his claim against the supervisory 27 defendant. 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Nurse Wang shall file a 2 responsive pleading to the second amended complaint within fourteen days from the date of this 3 order. 4 Dated: June 7, 2017 5 6 7 8 DLB7; /Inbox/Substantive;king1817.scrn.2AC 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?