King v. Wang et al
Filing
47
ORDER ADOPTING 46 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/03/17 DENYING defendant's 42 Motion to Dismiss; Defendant is directed to file an answer within 10 days. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID KING,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1817 KJM DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WANG,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
20
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On July 27, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
22
served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
23
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the
24
findings and recommendations.
25
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
26
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
27
ORDERED that:
28
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 27, 2017, are adopted in full;
2
2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 42) is denied; and
3
3. Defendant is directed to file an answer within ten (10) days from the date of this order.
4
DATED: October 3, 2017.
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?