Benjamin Tabayoyong Caridad v. Harry Oreol, et al
Filing
124
PROCEDURE AND PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/19/2018 ORDERING discovery of state attorney files shall be governed by the procedures set forth in this order, an any and all materials produced shall be subject to this Protective Order. (See Order for Details) (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BENJAMIN T. CARIDAD,
12
No. 2:14-cv-1847 KJM AC P
Petitioner,
13
14
STATE ATTORNEY FILES:
v.
HARRY OREOL,
15
PROCEDURE AND
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Respondent.
16
17
This habeas corpus case will be scheduled for an evidentiary hearing after completion of
18
current discovery. Petitioner has subpoenaed the legal and billing files of the attorney who has
19
represented him in his state civil commitment proceedings, Mr. Kenneth Rosenfeld (“state
20
attorney”). Discovery of state attorney file materials shall be governed by the procedure set forth
21
herein, and any and all materials produced shall be subject to this Protective Order.
22
No later than October 1, 2018, Mr. Rosenfeld shall produce his case file for the period
23
January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2017, for review and copying by both federal habeas counsel
24
and counsel for respondent. Review and any copying shall be completed no later than October
25
10, 2018.
26
27
28
All discovery of state attorney file materials shall be deemed to be confidential.
Documents and materials produced from the state attorney files (hereinafter “documents”) may be
1
used only by counsel for the parties and persons working under their direct supervision (including
2
expert consultants), and only for purposes of litigating the equitable tolling issue now before the
3
court. Disclosure of the contents of the documents and the documents themselves may not be
4
made to any other persons or agencies, including any other law enforcement or prosecutorial
5
personnel or agencies, without an order from this Court. The communications and materials may
6
not be used, cited, or relied upon by the state in any other proceedings against petitioner,
7
including any future retrial or commitment proceeding. This order extends to respondent and all
8
persons acting on behalf of respondent in this proceeding, including but not limited to persons
9
employed by the Office of the California Attorney General, persons working on this matter who
10
are employed by California governmental divisions other than the Attorney General, persons
11
retained by respondent for any investigative or consulting work on this matter, and any expert
12
consultants or witnesses assisting respondent.
13
This order shall continue in effect after the conclusion of the habeas corpus proceedings
14
and shall specifically apply in the event of a retrial of all or any portion of petitioner’s civil
15
commitment proceedings, except that either party maintains the right to request modification or
16
vacation of this order upon entry of final judgment in this matter.
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
DATED: September 19, 2018
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?