Holston v. Heaton
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/9/2015 GRANTING plaintiff's unopposed 29 motion to modify the schedule, as set forth in this order: Discovery due by 2/29/2016; Dispositive Motions shall be filed on or before 5/26/2016. If plaintiff wishes to obtain a particular video recording from defendant, he must request it from defendant in a proper request for discovery. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THERON KENNETH HOLSTON,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1853-TLN-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
HEATON,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. His unopposed motion to modify the schedule in this action (ECF No. 29) is
19
granted as set forth below. The schedule is modified as follows:
20
1.
The parties may conduct discovery until February 29, 2016. Any motions
21
necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All requests for discovery pursuant to
22
Fed. R. Civ. P. 31, 33, 34, or 36 shall be served not later than December 28, 2015.
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
If plaintiff seeks leave to amend the complaint, he must file any motion to amend
no later than February 29, 2016.
3.
Dispositive motions shall be filed on or before May 26, 2016. Motions shall be
briefed in accordance with paragraph 8 of the order filed May 15, 2015.
Plaintiff also requests a provision for “disclosure or discovery of electronically stored
information” so that he may obtain a video recording “of jail booking holding cell, booking area,
1
1
hallway leading to rubber room cell and rubber room cell.” ECF No. 29 at 2. If plaintiff wishes
2
to obtain a particular video recording from defendant, he must request it from defendant in a
3
proper request for discovery.
4
5
So ordered.
DATED: September 9, 2015.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?